Board of Education v. Pico | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States |
||||||
Argued March 2, 1982 Decided June 25, 1982 |
||||||
Full case name | Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26, et al. v. Pico, by his next friend Pico, et al. | |||||
Citations | 457 U.S. 853 (more) 102 S. Ct. 2799; 73 L. Ed. 2d 435; 1982 U.S. LEXIS 8; 8 Media L. Rep. 1721 |
|||||
Prior history | Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit | |||||
Holding | ||||||
The 1st Amendment limits the power of local school boards to remove library books from junior high schools and high schools. | ||||||
Court membership | ||||||
|
||||||
Case opinions | ||||||
Plurality | Brennan, joined by Marshall, Stevens; Blackmun (all but parts II-A(1)) | |||||
Concurrence | Blackmun | |||||
Concurrence | White | |||||
Dissent | Burger, joined by Powell, Rehnquist, O'Connor | |||||
Dissent | Powell | |||||
Dissent | Rehnquist, joined by Burger, Powell | |||||
Dissent | O'Connor | |||||
Laws applied | ||||||
U.S. Const. amend. I |
Board of Education v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853 (1982),[1] was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the First Amendment limits the power of local school boards to remove library books from junior high schools and high schools.
Contents |
According to the syllabus of the case:
According to footnote 3 of the ruling, the books at issue have included Slaughterhouse-Five, The Naked Ape, Down These Mean Streets, Go Ask Alice, and The Fixer.
While no single opinion commanded a majority of the Court—indeed, the case produced seven opinions from the nine Justices—the opinion of Justice Brennan, affirming the Court of Appeals, controlled the outcome of the case. Brennan announced the judgment of the Court and delivered an opinion joined by Justices Marshall and Stevens, and joined in all but Part II-A(1) by Justice Blackmun. Justice Blackmun filed an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Justice White filed an opinion concurring in the judgment.
Justice Brennan noted the Court had previously held that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate," Tinker v. Des Moines School District, 393 U.S. 503, 506 (1969). The First Amendment in this case included the right to read library books of the student's choosing.
Brennan concludes the plurality opinion with a discussion of the extent of the school board's authority to remove books from the school library:
As noted earlier, nothing in our decision today affects in any way the discretion of a local school board to choose books to add to the libraries of their schools. Because we are concerned in this case with the suppression of ideas, our holding [457 U.S. 853, 872] today affects only the discretion to remove books. In brief, we hold that local school boards may not remove books from school library shelves simply because they dislike the ideas contained in those books and seek by their removal to "prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion." West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S., at 642. Such purposes stand inescapably condemned by our precedents .
Justice Blackmun, concurring, concluded that a proper balance between the limited constitutional restriction imposed on school officials by the First Amendment and the broad state authority to regulate education, would be struck by holding that school officials may not remove books from school libraries for the purpose of restricting access to the political ideas or social perspectives discussed in the books, when that action is motivated simply by the officials' disapproval of the ideas involved.
Justice White, while agreeing that there should be a trial to resolve the factual issues, concluded that there is no necessity at this point for discussing the extent to which the First Amendment limits the school board's discretion to remove books from the school libraries.
Chief Justice Burger filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Powell, Rehnquist, and O'Connor joined. Justice Rehnquist filed a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Burger and Justice Powell joined. Justices Powell and O'Connor each filed an additional dissenting opinion.
Works related to Board of Education v. Pico at Wikisource